The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited gambling.

No, they weren't personally in participation, however the world-famous celebrities were conspicuously included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial sites providing both complimentary casino-style games and lucrative prizes, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'bet totally free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are simply two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of many video gaming corporations, not to discuss suit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments serve as conventional gambling establishments, only without the oversight, customer securities and tax laws. So not just can they prevent the high 24-percent federal sports betting levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the business faces allegations of prohibited gaming in a New York claim that claims VGW uses celeb endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its product. (See VGW's declaration listed below)

'I'm not sure" if you do not trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business running multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a series of celebs from sports betting enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any distinctions between traditional gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among numerous sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest advises fans to play at Chumba Casino, where many - however not all - games are totally free

Drake has an offer with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he regularly promotes on social media

Learn more

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements usually center around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while omitting the potential for actual gaming losses.

Others lure consumers with guarantees of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media ad displaying Drake's vehicles, aircrafts and estates before rotating to footage of the rapper playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' check out the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never ever provided up.'

The discrepancy in between gambling websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complicated, but operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the former.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competition with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, most of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for totally free.

'Most social sweeps customers never ever buy,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the typical deposit or wager size at real-money online sports betting websites.'

Social gambling establishments use consumers a chance to play casino-style games with good friends. Players have the option to buy worthless currency often referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, however can be utilized to open various features within the games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes video gaming, enabling consumers to acquire other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.

And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones claimed by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker occasion

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement flaunting Drake's automobiles, airplanes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are banned in all but seven states, which has actually assisted to sustain the appeal of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not require generally need recognition. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow clients to send mail-in requests for complimentary sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully particular directions. What's more, gamers are often rewarded with sweeps coins simply for signing up, thus providing a reason to try their hands at any variety of casino video games for an opportunity to win - or lose - genuine money.

So why are sweepstakes websites enabled to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the complimentary casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a way of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes games are merely a form of online home entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is needed to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever have to pay for a chance to win prizes. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a crucial difference in between social sweeps and conventional online gaming websites like gambling establishments.'

Think about the manner in which McDonald's uses its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, however rather they're buying hamburgers and fries that offer them the chance to win lucrative rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself doesn't meet the meaning of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing technique for promoting all kinds of daily companies in the United States, whatever from burgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home improvement shops,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are regularly used by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to many gambling market insiders, that argument does not cut it.

For beginners, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run forever. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, therefore recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last permanently and they're typically not tied to casino-style games of chance,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're just money free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the qualities commonly related to McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in perpetuity, the sweepstakes casinos offer" casino-like" payouts, generally 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the common payment percentage for a momentary marketing sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the income earned by the business [normally less than one percent]'

Wallach is quick to compare the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet cafes that sprang up in Florida, providing customers the chance to play casino-style video games for genuine rewards. Many of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually because been shuttered over claims of illegal sports betting.

DJ Khaled is amongst numerous celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos ought to deal with comparable analysis.

'These distinctions are not approximate,' Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. 'They have actually repeatedly been mentioned by courts and state attorney general of the United States as essential aspects in determining that a sweepstakes promo was in truth a guise for prohibited gaming.'

Among the casino industry's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing legislators to examine sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact brand-new legislation on the issue.

'Consumers are being deprived of defenses and states are passing up considerable tax and income chances as this gambling replaces that performed through controlled channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the plaintiffs who have taken legal action against social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 different cases in Kentucky without confessing any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, stating the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the newest claim, which is largely comparable to its predecessors, New York state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'unlawful gambling enterprise. '

Apple and Google have also been named as defendants in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment.

'We usually do not comment on matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com via email. 'However, we note that this claim has only just been submitted with the court and VGW has actually not been formally served.

'We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we operate, and remain confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play games throughout most of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a decade, producing not only great games, user experiences and home entertainment, however also guaranteeing this is done securely, properly and at the highest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are fairly typical across the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we intend to strongly defend any claim which may be brought against us.'

The problems between traditional online sports betting and sweepstakes gambling establishments might show problematic for some star endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with standard gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that professional athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting wagering 'sweeps' sites while at the exact same time the leagues wish to predict a strong position versus prohibited sports betting - specifically when trying to tamp down the periodic sports betting scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time ban from the NBA over allegations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting presumably prohibited gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a significant issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on athletes endorsing sweepstakes websites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the gamers' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also neglected to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a responsibility to explain to clients the differences and similarities between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have full confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our company practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'Some of our values are" our gamers come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious unlawful sports betting websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk along with courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege damage,' Glaser stated. 'There is likewise some risk that state regulators and state chief law officers rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with prohibited gambling.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton